"Neptune is nowhere near as cold as evolutionary theory predicts. Instead, it actually generates heat, radiating into space over twice the energy it receives from the Sun.
--This fits the Creation model very well, as a young Neptune could easily still be cooling off a few thousand years after its creation.
--However, this does not fit the evolutionary/long-age model, as many evolutionists have acknowledged.
Voyager had flown by the planet Uranus, discovering that Uranus’s magnetic field is tilted relative to the planet’s spin axis, and offset from the planet’s center. Both these characteristics contradict the evolutionary ‘dynamo’ model of planetary magnetism (this hypothetical ‘self-generating’ mechanism for sustaining a magnetic field is essential for long-agers, because without some renewal such fields decay away to nothing in only a few thousand years).
So, evolutionists consoled themselves by speculating that perhaps ‘Voyager had caught the field in the middle of a reversal (when the magnetic north and south poles switch places).’ This is very unlikely, but not necessarily impossible.
-x-But then Voyager flew by Neptune and discovered that its field was tilted and offset, too. Scientists were forced to concede that ‘it seems that the possibility of finding two planets both experiencing magnetic polarity reversals is small.’
*An article in a (pro-evolution) astronomy magazine explained it this way:
‘Pssst … astronomers who model the formation of the solar system have kept a dirty little secret: Uranus and Neptune don’t exist. Or at least computer simulations have never explained how planets as big as the two gas giants could form so far from the sun. Bodies orbited so slowly in the outer parts of the sun’s protoplanetary disk that the slow process of gravitational accretion would need more time than the age of the solar system to form bodies with 14.5 and 17.1 times the mass of Earth.’
---In evolutionary models, the farther you are from the middle of the cloud (where the Sun is today), the longer the planet-formation procedure requires. Neptune and Uranus are too far out to have formed according to this process, even over the supposed 4.5-billion-year age given to the solar system."
CMI
--This fits the Creation model very well, as a young Neptune could easily still be cooling off a few thousand years after its creation.
--However, this does not fit the evolutionary/long-age model, as many evolutionists have acknowledged.
Voyager had flown by the planet Uranus, discovering that Uranus’s magnetic field is tilted relative to the planet’s spin axis, and offset from the planet’s center. Both these characteristics contradict the evolutionary ‘dynamo’ model of planetary magnetism (this hypothetical ‘self-generating’ mechanism for sustaining a magnetic field is essential for long-agers, because without some renewal such fields decay away to nothing in only a few thousand years).
So, evolutionists consoled themselves by speculating that perhaps ‘Voyager had caught the field in the middle of a reversal (when the magnetic north and south poles switch places).’ This is very unlikely, but not necessarily impossible.
-x-But then Voyager flew by Neptune and discovered that its field was tilted and offset, too. Scientists were forced to concede that ‘it seems that the possibility of finding two planets both experiencing magnetic polarity reversals is small.’
*An article in a (pro-evolution) astronomy magazine explained it this way:
‘Pssst … astronomers who model the formation of the solar system have kept a dirty little secret: Uranus and Neptune don’t exist. Or at least computer simulations have never explained how planets as big as the two gas giants could form so far from the sun. Bodies orbited so slowly in the outer parts of the sun’s protoplanetary disk that the slow process of gravitational accretion would need more time than the age of the solar system to form bodies with 14.5 and 17.1 times the mass of Earth.’
---In evolutionary models, the farther you are from the middle of the cloud (where the Sun is today), the longer the planet-formation procedure requires. Neptune and Uranus are too far out to have formed according to this process, even over the supposed 4.5-billion-year age given to the solar system."
CMI
No comments:
Post a Comment